CodeVita is a free coding assessment platform that allows students to get real-world experience and receive feedback from industry experts.
CodeVita is currently being used by over 400,000 students across the globe. Students can use CodeVita to learn new languages, gain exposure to different technology stacks, and improve their skills by completing challenges and building projects. Students can also earn badges for their achievements and share their work on social media.
CodeVita makes it easier for companies to find top talent with its developer network. Companies can post jobs directly on CodeVita’s website or through its mobile app, where they will receive applications from qualified candidates using the platform.
Free Coding Assessment Platform
Need a technical assessment tool, but don’t know which one to choose?
Today, you’ll discover the 20 best coding assessment tools that will help you identify and hire the right candidates and build a world-class technical team.
Want to learn more? Read on!
How to choose your coding assessment tool
First things first:
How do you choose the right tool?
A great developer assessment tool will help you identify the best candidates who are a perfect fit for your team.
That’s why it’s so important that you first choose the right type of assessment tool. Here’s what you need to know.
What type of assessment tool should you choose?
Not all assessment tools are equally good at helping you identify the best tech talent.
Let me explain:
You might know that companies like Google and Facebook are known to use screening questions and whiteboarding challenges in their technical hiring processes.
But using screening tests and tools isn’t the best way to filter your candidates.
In fact, studies show that these challenges are downright bad for technical hiring. People perform worse when they feel stressed and you don’t get a realistic and truthful view of someone’s skills.
In other words:
You might end up hiring the wrong person.
And that can be costly. The cost of a bad hire can be 30% of that person’s first-year salary.
This is why take-home coding assignments are a far better way to assess developer skills. Fortunately, there are some great take-home coding challenge tools out there (which we’ll look at shortly).
Take-home coding challenges let developers perform their tests at home and ideally, in their own development environment.
The idea is to get a good understanding of how developers would perform on the job. This is a completely different assessment approach than asking developers to solve brainteasers. (Which only helps you understand how quick someone is on their feet in stressful situations or how prepared they are for the interview, not their actual coding abilities.)
Woman who codes
Ultimately, take-home coding challenges help you hire the best developers. This also means that they help you hire a more diverse team because candidates get to demonstrate their real-life skills and you reduce the risk of biased hiring decisions.
What to look for in a coding assessment tool
So, what should you look for in a coding assessment tool? Good question. Here are the features that are a must-have for well-executed coding challenges:
Ease of process. How easy is it to set up and run your coding challenges?
Candidate experience. Does the challenge create a great experience for candidates (even those you end up rejecting)?
Own challenges. Does the platform let you upload your own challenges?
Supported languages/frameworks. How many/which languages and frameworks does the platform support and are these languages/frameworks the ones you need?
Number of applicants. How many applicants can go through a challenge? (This usually depends on the subscription level you sign up for, but the tool you choose should make it possible for you to go up to a level where you can assess however many applicants you need.)
Number of seats for your team. Does the tool make it easy for your reviewers to review challenges and how many can collaborate simultaneously?
Flexibility/customizability. Does the tool make it possible to customize parts of the process according to your needs?
Support. What type of support do you get and how fast?
Scalability. Is the tool scalable for when your team grows?
Plagiarism detection. Does the tool make it possible to detect plagiarism? (However, the tool shouldn’t make this an intimidating experience but instead, effectively weed out plagiarism.)
Cost-effectiveness. Does the tool offer more value than what you pay for it?
Improved time-to-hire. Does the tool make it faster to hire new developers to your team?
For example, here’s what Aimee, Engineering Mentoring Program Lead, from Babbel said about their hiring criteria before the team started working with us:
“It took a lot of research before deciding on a platform to use for administering the Neos code challenges. We obviously had a bit of a unique scenario, thus the main criteria was flexibility, specifically on the below points:
Deciding on our own coding challenges
The languages the challenges will be available in
The number of applicants
The number of reviewers from Babbel
Pricing
Flexible subscriptionCodeSubmit stood out in all of the above. The feedback that we received from the candidates about their experience was overwhelmingly positive – specifically regarding the ease of the process, as well as the personal and engaging experience the process offered.”
Of course, this depends on YOUR needs and requirements.
For some teams, the defining criterion might be flexibility and for others, that the tool supports the right people on the team (such as non-technical hiring managers).
Start by defining your criteria.
And when you’re done, take a look at the 20 tools here below.
The 20 best coding assessment tools
What are the best coding assessment tools? Here below is one of the most comprehensive comparisons of leading technical assessment platforms. These tools work for teams and companies of different sizes — from small businesses to big multi corporations.
Best coding assessment tools
Read on to see which assessment platform works best for your needs.
- CodeSubmit
Founded: 2019
Free trial: Yes
CodeSubmit is the most flexible and candidate-friendly solution for administering and evaluating coding assignments and technical interviews on the market today. Built to replace later stage in-person interviews like whiteboarding and live-programming, CodeSubmit allows you to identify great candidates using real tasks in the form of a take-home assignment.
Everything about the platform is designed to provide strong signals and insights into your candidate’s real skill set while maintaining the best candidate experience possible.
CodeSubmit is the only platform that allows you to test candidates’ framework knowledge, and the CodeSubmit library currently includes over 50 of the most popular languages, frameworks and technologies used by frontend, backend and mobile teams worldwide.
Website | Capterra | Pricing
codesubmit homepage
Who is it for?
Small businesses and startups who want to consistently attract and hire the best developers while providing an excellent candidate experience.
Large teams and enterprises who are ready to adopt remote and asynchronous processes in lieu of whiteboarding or live-coding while ensuring that they always identify the best candidates in their talent pool.
Pros
Lets you create coding assignments specific to each open position. Every assignment contains evaluation criteria related to the work your engineers face in their day-to-day. All assessments are fully customizable to your engineering team’s stack. You can also upload your own coding assignment.
Supports 50+ languages and frameworks. (This makes CodeSubmit one of the most comprehensive tools.)
Offers real-time updates as your candidates progress through the CodeSubmit journey. Be on top of your hiring game without leaving your existing tools.
Helps you effectively detect plagiarism and quickly filter out misuse.
Focuses on the candidate experience to help you attract the best talent and build your employer brand.
Flexible monthly and annual pricing for small and large teams alike.
Cons
CodeSubmit specializes in remote and asynchronous take-home projects to replace in-person technical interviews. While their library does include shorter automated screening tests (CodeSubmit Bytes), it may not be the best tool for high-vollumn early-stage candidate screening.
- HackerRank
Founded: 2012
Free trial: Yes
HackerRank is one of the biggest technical interview platforms and also offers a skill development tool for developers. Originally founded in 2009 in Bangalore, HackerRank offers a customizable platform for technical teams. The company offers online technical assessments, real-time code-pair sessions, and take-home challenges.
HackerRank on Capterra
hackerrank homepage
Who is it for?
Corporations and multinationals that need a robust and compliance-friendly system. Many of HackerRank’s customers include big banks.
Pros
Various assessment options (for teams that need both screening and assessment tools).
Enterprise-level features (advanced integrations and security).
Cons
Prices start at $249/month, billed annually which can be on the higher end for smaller teams.
HackerRank isn’t specialized in one assessment tool type, ie. this isn’t necessarily a highly tailored tool if you’re looking for a certain type of assessment (like take-home coding challenges).
- Devskiller
Founded: 2013
Free trial: Yes
Devskiller is a tech sourcing, skill mapping, and screening tool based on the company’s RealLifeTesting™ methodology. With the tool, you can both interview and screen candidates. Devskiller makes it easy to customize tasks and you also get access to an API.
DevSkiller on Capterra
devskiller homepage
Who is it for?
Companies with technical hiring teams that need to customize features instead of relying on done-for-you tools.
Pros
A great tool for hands-on recruiters who want to access all the features they need in one tool and want the possibility to custom-build their own features.
Cons
The tool isn’t ideal for less technical hiring teams or teams that want a solution that is simpler to manage.
For teams that need less customization, pricing is on the higher end (monthly rates start at $399, billed annually)
- HackerEarth
Founded: 2012
Free trial: Yes
HackerEarth was originally created as a platform for corporate hackathons. Since then, it’s added code screening and pair programming interview functions. As a screening platform, HackerEarth serves companies that want to filter candidates early on in the process, rather than identify the best candidates.
HackerEarth on Capterra
hackerearth homepage
Who is it for?
Companies that have the “champagne problem” of too many qualified candidates and need to screen candidates quickly. These are mainly companies with enterprise needs.
Pros
A platform that makes it easy to get started (you don’t need to talk to sales).
Robust tools to fight plagiarism.
The platform allows you to both run hackathons and screen candidates.
Cons
Many of the plagiarism-fighting features can repel candidates because they make tests feel like whiteboarding tests (eg. recording candidates while they’re working through the test).
This is not the most robust tool for assessing candidates’ actual skills and identifying the right candidates.
- HireVue
Founded: 2004
Free trial: No
HireVue is one of the bigger assessment platforms. It offers video interviewing, assessments, and interview scheduling functions. While HireVue isn’t solely focused on developer recruiting, it does offer technical assessments.
HireVue on Capterra
hirevue homepage
Who is it for?
Teams that need a tool with more capabilities than just assessments and that have the capacity to work with a non-specialized tool.
Pros
Strong reference customers, including Unilever and Dow Jones.
Includes a video interview process for those companies that want to reduce the number of phone screens.
Cons
This is not a platform that specializes in technical assessments, even if the platform includes these types of tools.
Candidates can feel intimidated by the video interview features.
- Qualified
Founded: 2016
Free trial: Yes
Qualified is a developer-friendly developer skill assessment platform. This tool lets you test skills with multi-file, language-specific online coding tests that developers complete in their own development environment. Customers include Apple and GE. The founders are the creators of Codewars, a code challenge platform for skills development.
Qualified on Capterra
qualified homepage
Who is it for?
Companies that need a simple, but effective way to assess technical talent and that don’t have a lot of requirements for the languages and frameworks they assess. For example, smaller startups or teams hiring for certain developer roles.
Pros
The platform offers blind reviews, which can help you build a more diverse team.
Also offers pair-programming interviews and code playback features that make it easy to review developers’ thought-process.
Cons
Qualified only supports 28 languages, which is on the lower end for most coding assessment platforms.
- Codility
Founded: 2009
Free trial: Yes
Codility is a skill-testing platform that offers screening and interviewing functionalities. It’s somewhat similar to HackerRank, but at a lower price point. The platform counts Tesla and Microsoft as its users.
Codility on Capterra
codility homepage
Who is it for?
Enterprise-level organizations that need robust compliance features and teams with less tech-savvy hiring managers.
Pros
Codility offers compliance features that can be helpful to enterprise-level organizations.
The platform includes features that make it easy to compare programmers’ skills, so it’s ideal for non-technical hiring managers.
Cons
For teams with true coding skill assessment needs, Codility’s screening tests might not be enough.
Users report that candidates aren’t always graded properly, which might lead to overlooking qualified candidates.
- CodeSignal
Founded: 2014
Free trial: Yes
CodeSignal offers three products: Screening and real-time interviewing tools, as well as Certify, a proctored coding assessment test. This platform also includes tools for developers to practice their skills.
CodeSignal on Capterra
codesignal homepage
Who is it for?
Fast-growing companies that need to scale their hiring efforts quickly.
Pros
Certify can help make more data-driven hiring decisions, as hiring teams need to rely less on resumes and more on actual skills from the start.
A sleek UI, which makes it easier to set up tests and invite candidates.
Cons
Some of the plagiarism detection features can repel clients from completing the challenge (for example, video recordings).
- CoderByte
Founded: 2018
Free trial: Yes
CoderByte offers a platform with three different functionalities: screening, interviewing, and take-home challenges. The customizable platform allows hiring teams to manage different stages of the hiring process in one place. CoderByte offers many integrations and customization options, which makes it a good choice for teams with very specific needs.
CoderByte on Capterra
coderbyte homepage
Who is it for?
Companies that need a cost-effective tool that allows them to manage different hiring process stages in one platform.
Pros
One of the cheapest options available, with unlimited assessments for all plans.
Advanced customizability and options for integrations.
Cons
Users and candidates report that the experience is sometimes not optimal.
Take-home challenges don’t support that many languages (18).
- CoderPad
Founded: 2013
Free trial: Yes
CoderPad offers a live programming environment with both live interview features and a new take-home challenge offering. Hiring teams can use CoderPad’s challenges or use their own. CoderPad also comes with some integration options.
CoderPad on Capterra
coderpad homepage
Who is it for?
Companies planning on using live assessments but who are also maybe interested in take-homes.
Pros
CoderPad offers one of the cheaper take-home options, as its subscriptions start at $50. This grants personal access to one user.
Cons
Supports approximately 30 languages and frameworks, which means that some teams might not be able to use this tool for their assessment needs.
Take-home offering is in the fledgling stages and not fully realized.
- Byteboard
Founded: 2019
Free trial: No
Byteboard is a relatively new tool that focuses heavily on helping enterprise companies create diverse teams. The company is founded by Google’s own in-house incubator, Area 120. Byteboard is currently available for mobile, web, backend engineering, and data engineering roles.
byteboard homepage
Who is it for?
Enterprise teams that want to level up their hiring processes when it comes to diverse hiring.
Pros
Byteboard offers an end-to-end solution, which makes it ideal for teams that need more hands-on support.
Advanced tools for diverse hiring, such as anonymization features.
Cons
Byteboard only supports nine languages, which can make it very challenging for many teams to use this tool.
- CodinGame
Founded: 2012
Free trial: Yes
CodinGame provides a platform for coding skill tests, as well as games for developers to help them practice their skills. As the platform is created by former video game designers, it takes a slightly different approach to developer hiring. Developers can develop their skills with fun games and employers can create engaging tests that take 60 seconds to set up. You also get access to challenges that aim to retain talent.
CodinGame on Capterra
codingame homepage
Who is it for?
Companies that are looking to engage and retain talent.
Pros
CodinGames engages a pool of developers through their skill practice solution. You can tap into that talent pool to fill your hiring pipeline.
The platform takes a slightly different, fun approach to coding assessments. This can help you create a more engaging employer brand.
Cons
If you need a more robust assessment tool, CodinGame’s tech skill tests might not be enough and you’ll need a different tool to create an advanced hiring process.
Some users have said that the assessments are not close enough to real work to provide a good indicator of skill.
- TestDome
Founded: 2013
Free trial: Yes
TestDome is a technical skill assessment platform for various industries, including programming, accounting, and customer service. Many of its skills tests are more general (rather than focused on a specific coding skill) and assess skills like sales and reasoning.
TestDome on Capterra
testdome homepage
Who is it for?
Companies that are looking to screen candidates, don’t need a robust skill assessment, and don’t have a lot of requirements for their tests.
Pros
Pay-as-you-go pricing that can be advantageous to teams that don’t want to sign up for a subscription.
Cons
Not a niche solution, which means that the platform might not cater to all the needs of technical hiring teams.
Only supports 10+ languages/frameworks.
Plagiarism detection can be intimidating to candidates (for example, the platform’s webcam monitoring feature).
- Toggl Hire
Founded: 2017
Free trial: Yes
Toggl Hire on Capterra
Toggl Hire is a simple screening solution for developer hiring and allows you to “go from 500 applicants to the 50 strongest candidates in one afternoon.”
toggl hire homepage
Who is it for?
Enterprise companies who have hundreds of candidates and want to narrow down the top 10%.
Pros
Easily filters candidates by scores and tags.
Integrates with the most popular ATS.
Offers a public API.
Cons
Currently only supports 30 languages.
Skills tests are more like quizzes and do not resemble real world projects.
- Hired Assessments (Formerly Py)
Founded: 2012
Free trial: No
Py, a Y Combinator-backed company, was acquired by Hired in 2019 and rebranded as Hired Assessments. Through the acquisition, Hired, a marketplace that matches recruiters with tech talent, expanded its offerings to include tools for hiring processes.
Hired Assessments on Capterra
hired assessments homepage
Who is it for?
A good tool for companies that are looking to diversify their assessments.
Pros
Three options to choose from: challenges (coding quizzes and challenges for screening), projects to simulate real-world problems, and live challenges that let you interview candidates in a live code environment.
Cons
Hired supports 16 languages, which is fewer than many other developer skill test tools.
- Imocha (Interview Mocha)
Founded: 2012
Free trial: No
Imocha, or Interview Mocha as it was previously known, offers 2,000+ ready-made skill tests and a robust enterprise-ready platform. The platform offers live interviewing and skill assessment features.
Imocha on Capterra
imocha homepage
Who is it for?
SMBs and enterprises that need a well-managed skills library.
Pros
Robust enterprise-level features.
An extensive skills library.
Cons
Imocha supports 20+ coding languages, so even though the tool comes with a skills library, it might not work for every hiring team’s needs.
- Mettl
Mettl offers different features for technical hiring teams, including an online coding interview platform, an online hackathon platform, and a role-based simulator. The focus is more on screening and interviewing candidates than later-stage assessments.
Mettl on Capterra
mettl homepage
Who is it for?
Companies that need to screen and filter candidates, ie. larger companies that receive plenty of applications.
Pros
An extensive repository of 100,000+ technical questions for 300+ skills.
An end-to-end platform for screening and interviewing candidates.
Cons
If your hiring team is looking for skill assessment later on in the process, Mettl doesn’t offer a robust take-home project solution.
- LeetCode
Founded: 2015
Free trial: No
LeetCode is a San Francisco-based startup that focuses primarily on helping software developers enhance their skills and prepare for technical interviews. The company also offers some features for helping businesses assess candidates.
leetcode homepage
Who is it for?
Companies that need to expand their pool of candidates and want to tap into LeetCode’s database of developers.
Pros
A talent pool of candidates using LeetCode to prepare for interviews.
Cons
If you’re specifically looking for a skill assessment tool, this one is not likely to send you the strongest signals.
- Tests4Geeks
Founded: 2013
Free trial: Yes
Test4Geeks is an assessment tool that offers a library of tests, as well as the possibility for users to create their own tests. The tests are mostly quiz-like and the company positions itself more in the screening process.
Tests4Geeks on Capterra
test4geeks homepage
Who is it for?
Test4Geeks is ideal for companies that want to screen candidates and need a relatively affordable and simple tool.
Pros
Simple to use and doesn’t come with unnecessary features.
Cons
If you’re looking for more robust and customizable assessment features, this tool might not be the best fit.
- GLIDERai
Founded: 2015
Free trial: Yes
GLIDER.ai is a screening tool for various roles (including tech, operations, sales, and marketing). The tool uses interactive question types and simulations for real-world tasks. The focus is on screening candidates, rather than skills assessments.
GLIDERai on Capterra
glider.ai homepage
Who is it for?
Companies that want to focus on screening and need a tool for more than tech roles.
Pros
A screening platform that is simple to use.
Cons
Users report that the interface doesn’t always work as it should.
If you’re looking for a more thorough assessment tool, this might not be the perfect fit.
How to use coding assessment tools for the best results
What’s the next step in assessing your candidates after you’ve found the perfect assessment platform for your needs?
You’ll likely want to get started using the platform in the right way and start sending out those invites. But skill assessments don’t always offer the best candidate experience, and developers aren’t that excited about going through hours of unpaid work without anything to show for it (see here and here).
You need a candidate-friendly process for administering assessments.
Avoid poorly executed coding challenges
Coding challenges that are poorly executed will quickly mean that you lose out on talent. But what does a bad coding challenge look like?
Simple: Challenges that are too long (coding challenges that last hours or even days) and have a clunky, anxiety-inducing interface that restricts candidates from performing their best.
And also challenges where the hiring team doesn’t offer any feedback.
Remember: Candidates spend their valuable time on your assignment. Show that you value it too by offering feedback on what they did well and what they can improve the next time around.
Using coding challenges in the right way
What, then, does a good coding challenge look like?
First, start by defining the evaluation criteria. You need to be clear on this before you ask developers to spend time on your challenge.
And second, create a coding challenge that is the right length. Three to four hours is sufficient — not too long, but long enough for you to have something to evaluate.
Finally, spend some time on making sure that the experience of taking your assessment empowers candidates to demonstrate their skill and do their best work.
best coding assessment tools
You can’t hire a software engineer without seeing their code, so you’ll need code assessment in your interview process. While you can always build a workflow yourself, there are a bunch of code assessment tools out there to make your job easier and streamline your process.
We compared the industry’s top code assessment platforms and stacked them up against each other. Check them out below (in no particular order):
1) HackerRank
code assessment
HackerRank is dubbed as the market-leading technical skills assessment platform to identify and hire developers with the right skills. They have over 2000 customers across all industries that use their assessments to interview, assess, and hire talents worldwide.
What to Expect?
HackerRank currently supports 35 programming languages used in their assessments. Some of the test cases are not organized properly but there is an option to write your own challenge depending on the company’s open role.
They also provide detailed analysis and comparison with other candidates which helps make better hiring decisions.
Their starter package starts at $249 per month which comes with a 1 full-access license.
Who is it for?
This code assessment platform is suitable for companies hiring for front-end, back-end, full-stack, DevOps, or data science roles.
2) HackerEarth
code assessment
HackerEarth allows you to create accurate skill-based assessments that will help you screen candidates effectively, saving you time and cost.
What to Expect
They have strict anti-plagiarism programs such as disabling copy and pasting in assessments and disabling tab switching in a test environment.
HackerEarth currently has 35 programming languages you can choose from.
Who is it for?
If you want a robust anti-plagiarism feature that will filter out unqualified candidates immediately, then this tool is highly recommended for your company.
3) CodinGame
code assessment
CodinGame screens and ranks candidates at the beginning of the hiring process based on standards that you’ve set. Their hands-on challenges validate candidates’ coding skills which save you time and effort.
What to Expect
The pre-loaded assessments come with coding games that make the user experience more enjoyable.
They have 25 programming languages available to be used.
The platform’s UI is easy to use and can be navigated easily by non-technical users.
The majority of the platform’s questions are theoretical instead of hands-on coding exercises.
Who is it for?
This code assessment platform is for a company that wants to shorten their hiring process timeline while making sure that they still hire skilled programmers and developers.
4) Codility
code assessment
Codility’s evidence-based platform helps hiring teams predict the real-life skills of their candidates at scale. This frees engineers to spend more time solving problems that matter and builds engineering teams faster. That’s why we’re already used by the most innovative hiring teams around the world.
What to Expect
One of Codility’s products, CodeCheck tests real-life skills for all roles, programming languages, and frameworks at all levels of difficulty.
They have limited task libraries but it is easy to create your own challenge.
The platform can be integrated with an ATS that improves the recruitment process.
You are able to choose tasks using the 14 different programming languages available.
Who is it for?
This platform is intended for companies looking to hire senior engineers, building a diverse team, and if you are hiring at a high scale.
5) CodeSignal
code assessment
Codesignal is a technical assessment platform that helps companies hire candidates based on their skills and not their resume. CodeSignal’s Certify, Test, and Interview solutions are used to assess candidates throughout the entire hiring process.
What to Expect
CodeSignal’s Certify offers proctored coding assessments that provide certification to software engineers that can be an alternative to resumes.
Their starter package is priced at $500 per month which includes one licensed user.
The platform supports 70+ languages, frameworks, and tools.
Who is it for?
Their automated proctoring feature is ideal for companies who want to ensure scale supervision during the code assessment process.
6) Coderbyte
code assessment
Coderbyte is a pre-employment testing tool that helps companies conduct coding assessments for their technical roles. It also provides transparent pricing and is an easy to use platform which caused companies to use this platform instead of their competitors.
What to Expect
The prices for the packages that they offer are lower compared to other assessment platforms available in the market.
The platform provides a detailed candidate report which includes score, if any plagiarism was committed, and test recordings.
They regulate the ability to add custom challenges to ensure that they provide the best candidate experience.
They offer limited challenge options for front-end development, and their library of open questions have limited options.
Who is it for?
This platform is suitable for non-technical TA teams that are hiring for front-end developers, back-end developers, DevOps, data scientists, and mobile engineers.
7) Coderpad
code assessment
Coderpad is an interview tool designed to let candidates write programs that run. It is a very simple and user-friendly tool while still allowing users to feel like they are working in a real environment.
What to Expect
Their real-time interviews make it easier for recruiters to review codes immediately.
The tool also allows both interviewer and interviewee to run code at the same time while it is being written.
They currently have 31 programming languages available to be used.
Who is it for?
If collaborating with candidates is one of the things that you do during your company’s hiring process, then this code assessment platform is worth checking.
8) Devskiller
code assessment
Devskiller is a developer screening and online interview platform powered by RealLifeTesting methodology. The tool allows you to find developers with the right skill set, shortening your Time-to-Hire by 60%. Their programming tests mirror the 1st day of work experience to identify top performers. They go beyond testing languages by testing frameworks, libraries, and databases.
What to Expect
The platform has a wide selection of assessments from pre-made to customized tests. Customized tests require a zip file to be uploaded compared to other platforms where you can create the task within the tool.
Their customizable UI helps non-technical recruiters navigate the platform with ease.
The pricing model of Devskiller is aimed at large organizations. There are no available pricing plans for small businesses.
The platform supports almost every main programming language such as C++, Android, iOS, Ruby, and Python.
Who is it for?
This platform is for large companies with a highly technical talent acquisition team looking to hire candidates for frontend, backend, and mobile technologies.
9) Qualified.io
code assessment
Qualified allows companies to use coding assessments and pair programming interviews to screen and hire technical talents faster. Assessments can be turned into pair-programming and can be timed and recorded to give hiring managers deeper insight into the candidates’ thought process and problem-solving abilities.
What to Expect
Customized assessments can easily be made within the tool. Also, the technical challenges can be combined in order to properly assess candidates.
They provide code review tools that will save time and give insights to the candidates’ code quality and working style.
The tool supports 28 programming languages.
Who is it for?
This platform is recommended for a company that wants to hire software engineers 100% remotely.
10) Filtered.AI
code assessment
Filtered.AI helps you create requirements for technical skills and culture fit wherein assessments are generated based on the technical position open. Using the platform has provided candidates with good user experience.
What to Expect
The Starter package is free, which includes unlimited interviews, auto-scored coding challenges, and candidate authentication. The option does not provide any reporting tools or data export capabilities at the moment.
Their fraud detection tool immediately provides a notification to the proctor to avoid cheating or copying.
Who is it for?
If your Talent Acquisition team can generate their own reports, then this is the right tool for your company.
11) Byteboard
code assessment
Byteboard is an interview tool that was created in Google’s Area 120. This interview platform relies on project-based interviews which assesses the technical skills that are being used on the job.
What to Expect
The evaluation process is anonymous which eliminates any biased decisions.
The 9 programming languages available were validated and tested by experienced software engineers.
Who is it for?
This code assessment platform is applicable for companies that are only looking to hire mobile, web and backend engineering roles.
Conclusion
Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.
Check out other publications to gain access to more digital resources if you are just starting out with Flux Resource.
Also contact us today to optimize your business(s)/Brand(s) for Search Engines